USPTO serial 76320629
TORO OSBORNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TORO OSBORNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Weinstein
3045 EAST ALAMEDA AVENUESUITE 500DENVER, CO 80209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Ale, brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beer; non-alcoholic malt beverage; alcoholic and non-alcoholic beers; syrups for making fruit drinks; concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks and fruit drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wine, port wines, sherry, liqueurs, brandy, distilled spirits, distilled spirits made from fruit; alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Contract food services, namely, catering services; full-service and self-service restaurants; delicatessen restaurants, cocktail lounge buffets, cocktail lounge and bar services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUPO OSBORNE, S.A
- Other trademarks owned by Osborne Distribuidora, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Osborne Distribuidora, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TORO OSBORNE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |