Drawing for SPINSEP

USPTO serial 76320658

SPINSEP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2852420Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 15, 2004
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SPINSEP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian L. Saffer

Ian L. Saffer Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001ANTIBODY BASED CELL SEPARATION REAGENTS FOR SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH USESECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 26, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 30, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 16, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 25, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance