Drawing for NANOEDGE

USPTO serial 76322804

NANOEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Liss

MARK J LISS ATTN LYNN A SULLIVANLEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Drug delivery preparations designed to formulate and deliver pharmaceuticals for injectable useACTIVE
010Containers for administering parenteral solutions for drug delivery purposesACTIVE
035Business consulting services in the area of formulating pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE
040Custom manufacture of injectable pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE
042Consulting services in the area of providing advanced formulation and manufacturing technologies and services for injectable pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 13, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 18, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance