Drawing for WEBPRONEWS

USPTO serial 76323231

WEBPRONEWS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBPRONEWS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd E. Stockwell

TODD E STOCKWELL STOCKWELL & ASSOCIATES861 CORPORATE DR STE 201LEXINGTON, KY 40503-5434UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A COLLECTION OF ACCESSIBLE NEWS STORIES IN THE FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY, BUSINESS, AND COMPUTERS ON A WORLD WIDE COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVEMar 8, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 25, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 25, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jul 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 18, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 1, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Apr 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 4, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 4, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 24, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 13, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance