USPTO serial 76323231
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lexington, KY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd E. Stockwell
TODD E STOCKWELL STOCKWELL & ASSOCIATES861 CORPORATE DR STE 201LEXINGTON, KY 40503-5434UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A COLLECTION OF ACCESSIBLE NEWS STORIES IN THE FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY, BUSINESS, AND COMPUTERS ON A WORLD WIDE COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Mar 8, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |