USPTO serial 76323908
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce E. O'Connor
BRUCE E O'CONNOR CHRISTENSEN OCONNOR JOHNSON1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-1344UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | components of marine autopilots, namely mechanical drive units, hydraulic pumps, sprockets, chains, shafts, and flex shafts | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | marine autopilots; electronic apparatus for coupling electronic geographic position indicators for marine autopilots; electronic apparatus for connecting marine guidance equipment to computer networks; rudder angle indicators; speed logs; components of marine autopilots, namely, magnetic and hall-effect compasses, compass enclosures, compensating magnets and ferrites for compasses, heeling tubes for adjusting compasses, junction boxes, remote controls, rudder angle indicators, rudder angle encoders, limit switches, rectifier units, solenoid valves, relays, electric motors, and controllers; wind vanes and wind direction indicators | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |