Drawing for SPLASHER-BLASTER

USPTO serial 76326801

SPLASHER-BLASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPLASHER-BLASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER, PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028WATER TOYS, NAMELY, WATER GUNSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 22, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 21, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 24, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 24, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 20, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 29, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance