Drawing for UNDERSTANDING MEN

USPTO serial 76328356

UNDERSTANDING MEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNDERSTANDING MEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Anne Hancock

B ANNE HANCOCK134 TETBURY AVECONCORD, NC 28025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely conducting workshops for women in the field of personal awarenessACTIVESep 24, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Oct 5, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Jun 10, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 5, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 31, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 23, 2003REINREINSTATED
Dec 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance