Drawing for NAVICPMART

USPTO serial 76328597

NAVICPMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2703315Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 2003
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with NAVICPMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay H. Begler

Jay Begler Niesar & Vestal LLP90 New Montgomery StreetNinth FloorSan Bruno, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035electronic marketplace via the global computer network in the field of testing and measuring equipmentSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 30, 2001
042Providing information relating to the procurement of test and measurement equipmentSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 30, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2023CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Apr 1, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 15, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 17, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Dec 17, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 17, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Dec 17, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 29, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 23, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
May 6, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Apr 22, 2008ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 5, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Jan 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance