USPTO serial 76330862
TOP LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3500490Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2008
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOP LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SCHOUTEN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTING, B.V.
2001 DH Haarlem, NL
Other trademarks owned by SCHOUTEN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTING, B.V.
6002 SM WEERT, NL
6002 SM WEERT, NL
6002 SM WEERT, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Clarke Holman
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laboratory equipment and accessories, namely, gas chromatographs, atomic absorption spectrophotometers, UV-VIS spectrophotometers, total carbon analyzers, sulphur analyzers, high performance liquid chromatographs, inductively coupled plasma spectrophotometers, shakers, balances, ovens, centrifuges, conductivity meters, dissolved oxygen meters, pH meters, furnaces, ion selective meters, titrators, heating mantles, stirrers, incubators, microscopes, turbidity meters, mixers, homogenizers, sample concentrators, ultrasonic cleaning baths, sleeve shakers, sieve shakers, flash point tester, melting point apparatus, viscometers, leaching test apparatus, air sampling monitors, respirometers, beakers, bottles, flasks, sample vials, Bunsen burners, crucibles, optical filters, pipettes, evaporating dishes, condensers, desiccators, forceps, test tubes, drying tubes, thermometers, reactionating columns, bottle stoppers, U-tubes, tripods, retort stands, retort rods, retort rings, microscope slides, microscope glass slide covers, microscope slide boxes, tongs, trays, trolleys, rubber tubing, neoprene tubing, vacuum tubing, tubing disconnectors, eye shield spectacles, goggles, respirators other than for artificial respiration, disposable latex gloves, safety shields, sample dippers, refractometers, absorptiometers, chloride analyzers, moisture analyzers, CO analyzers, water analyzers, anemometers, barometers, mercury collectors, Petri dishes, pipette racks, scoops, spatulas, disposable reusable dispenser syringes and needles, pipettors, carboys, cell culture apparatus, colorimeters, comparators, cellulose membranes, flash point testers, cloud and pour flash point testers, copper test meters, measuring cups, density meters, dew point meters, scalpels, sample dividers, block heaters, flame photometers, flint lighters, flocculation testers, magnifiers, filter papers, electrodes, circulators, hygrometers, hydrometers, photometers, hardness testers, pressure recorders, hygrographs, immersion heaters, immersion coolers, infra-red spectrophotometers, inoculators, accumulator jars, flame photometers, slide dispensers, laboratory jacks, gas lighters, microplates, transport containers, radiation meters, temperature meters, sound level meters, Nessler tubes, Nessler cylinders, nitrogen determination sensors, non-return valves, oxygen determination sensors, particle size testers, timers, reaction vessels, refuse bins, gas sampling bags, refuse sacks, safety screens, sieves, wet gas meters, and volt meters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHOUTEN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTING, B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by TRESPA INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by TRESPA INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by TRESPA INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TOP LAB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |