USPTO serial 76331759
PRISZM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3199997Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRISZM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, Ontario L3R 0P6, CA
Markham, Ontario L3R 0P6, CA
Markham, Ontario L3R 0P6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore D. Lienesch
THEODORE D LIENESCH THOMPSON HINE LLP2000 COURTHOUSE PLZ N E10 W SECOND STDAYTON, OH 45402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation and business management services provided to restaurants; restaurant franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants, restaurant management services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |