Drawing for RHUSIGEN

USPTO serial 76337574

RHUSIGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHUSIGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles H. Oppenheimer

CHARLES H OPPENHEIMER SCHERING CORP2000 GALLOPING HILL RDKENILWORTH, NJ 07033UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Veterinary vaccines for swineACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 11, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Mar 8, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Mar 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 10, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 11, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 11, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 11, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 7, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance