USPTO serial 76337681
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lex Mathis
LEX MATHIS SOUND LAW GROUP4033 AURORA AVE N 2ND FLSEATTLE, WA 98103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Oscillating portable fans, stand fans, table fans, wall fans, ceiling fans, electric household and portable fans | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |