Drawing for BOSTON HARBOR

USPTO serial 76337681

BOSTON HARBOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOSTON HARBOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lex Mathis

LEX MATHIS SOUND LAW GROUP4033 AURORA AVE N 2ND FLSEATTLE, WA 98103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Oscillating portable fans, stand fans, table fans, wall fans, ceiling fans, electric household and portable fansACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 28, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 28, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 28, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 28, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Sep 28, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2004NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Jan 22, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 22, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 8, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 10, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 18, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 6, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance