Drawing for STRATA DECISION TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76338799

STRATA DECISION TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STRATA DECISION TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth A. Evert

ELISABETH A EVERT SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD717 N HARWOOD ST STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for capital budgeting and resource allocation using multi-objective decision analysis, financial analysis, and mathematical optimization methods; computer software for financial forecasting, risk analysis and strategic planning; computer software for developing enterprise-wide databases of financial models and probabilistic risk analysis results; computer software for managing, tracking and reporting of capital budgets; and computer software used by others to access computerized databases of information compiled by suppliers of capital equipment and products in the medical and health-care related industriesACTIVEJan 1, 1997
035business services, namely, consulting in the fields of financial forecasting , business plan development, capital budgeting and strategic resource allocationsACTIVEJan 1, 1997
042computer services, namely consulting services for computer software; and computer software design and developmentACTIVEJan 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 24, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 17, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance