USPTO serial 76338799
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth A. Evert
ELISABETH A EVERT SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD717 N HARWOOD ST STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for capital budgeting and resource allocation using multi-objective decision analysis, financial analysis, and mathematical optimization methods; computer software for financial forecasting, risk analysis and strategic planning; computer software for developing enterprise-wide databases of financial models and probabilistic risk analysis results; computer software for managing, tracking and reporting of capital budgets; and computer software used by others to access computerized databases of information compiled by suppliers of capital equipment and products in the medical and health-care related industries | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1997 |
| 035 | business services, namely, consulting in the fields of financial forecasting , business plan development, capital budgeting and strategic resource allocations | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1997 |
| 042 | computer services, namely consulting services for computer software; and computer software design and development | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |