Drawing for TELENIUM

USPTO serial 76340174

TELENIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2792297Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 9, 2003
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELENIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Internet protocol telephony systems comprising telephones, internet protocol telephony routers, attendants and gateways, local area networks, and software for providing internet protocol telephony communicationsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDAug 20, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2010WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Dec 31, 2010WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Apr 9, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 12, 2007C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Mar 12, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 13, 2006CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Feb 13, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 9, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Sep 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 29, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 22, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 22, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 20, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance