USPTO serial 76352185
CHUKKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2004
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHUKKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas W. Sprinkle
DOUGLAS W SPRINKLE GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Equestrian apparel, namely, hats, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, pants and shorts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 23, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |