USPTO serial 76354065
INTERLAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2006
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with INTERLAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
40880 Ratingen, DE
40880 Ratingen, DE
40880 Ratingen, DE
40880 Ratingen, DE
40880 Ratingen, DE
40880 Ratingen, DE
RATINGEN, DE
RATINGEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Gurfinkel
Daniel M. Gurfinkel Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2002 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS FOR SERVICE PERSONNEL AND USERS IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND DATA PROCESSING | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2002 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL TESTING FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES, HARDWARE COMPONENTS AND SOFTWARE COMPONENTS FOR INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; PERFORMING QUALITY TESTS FOR OTHERS ON COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES, HARDWARE COMPONENTS AND SOFTWARE FOR THE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; DEVELOPMENT OF TESTING PROCEDURES FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES, HARDWARE COMPONENTS AND SOFTWARE FOR THE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; TECHNICAL CONSULTING IN PLANNING, CARRYING OUT AND EVALUATING TESTS ON COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES, HARDWARE COMPONENTS AND SOFTWARE FOR THE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR TESTING LABS, WHEREIN COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND HARDWARE COMPONENTS FOR THE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY ARE TESTED, NAMELY, TROUBLE-SHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS, TROUBLE-SHOOTING OF COMMUNICATION DEVICES; PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELDS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS RESEARCH | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 7 layers AG
- Other trademarks owned by 7 layers AG
- Other trademarks owned by 7 layers AG
- Other trademarks owned by 7 layers AG
- Other trademarks owned by 7 layers AG
- Other trademarks owned by 7 layers AG
- Other trademarks owned by 7 LAYERS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by 7 LAYERS GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTERLAB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |