USPTO serial 76355118
BANJA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BANJA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-59110 La Madeleine, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES T.J. WEIGELL
TODD BRAVERMAN BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD UTENSILS, NAMELY, KITCHEN SERVING TONGS, SPOONS, AND LADLES; CONTAINERS FOR FOODS; CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN USE; HAIR COMBS; SPONGES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, NAMELY, SCRUBBING BRUSHES; FLOOR BRUSHES; ARTICLES FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, NAMELY, SCRUBBING BRUSHES, SCRUBBING BRUSHES FOR FLOODS, BRUSHES FOR CLEANING WINDOWS AND OTHER GLASS PANELS; DISH BRUSHES, NAIL BRUSHES, BRUSHES FOR CLEANING CONTAINERS AND BUCKETS, BOTTLE BRUSHES; STEEL WOOD FOR CLEANING; BEVERAGE GLASSWARE; CANDLE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; CUPS; SAUCERS; COFFEE MUGS; PLATES; BOWLS; JARS; JUGS; SERVING WARE FOR SERVING FOOD; SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS; PEPPER MILS; CONTAINERS FOR OIL and VINEGAR; TUMBLERS; VASES; STEMWARE, NAMELY, GOBLETS, WINE GLASSES; CHAMPAGNE FLUTES, MARTINI GLASSES, MARGARITA GLASSES; DINNERWARE; BUTTER DISHES; CREAMERS; SUGAR BOWLS; GRAVY BOATS; OVAL SERVING DISHES; TEA POTS; RAMEKINS; EGG CUPS; ONION SOUP BOWLS; PITCHERS; NAPKIN HOLDERS; ESCARGOT DISHES; FONDUE PLATES; BREAD BOXES; CUTTING BOARDS; PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS; BANANA HOLDERS; WINE RACK; MEAL TRAYS; SERVING TRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; FLATWARE MADE OF STAINLESS STEEL, NAMELY; FORKS, KNIVES, SPOONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |