USPTO serial 76355120
BANJA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BANJA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-5910 La Madeleine, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES T.J. WEIGELL
TODD BRAVERMAN BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH AN ONLINE COMPUTER GAME; INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS FEATURING INTERACTIVE ANIMATED PRESENTATION AND ANIMATED CHARACTERS; VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR TELEVISION; HAND HELD VIDEO GAME MACHINES; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; BICYCLE HELMETS; FOOTBALL HELMETS; PROTECTIVE SKATING HELMETS; EYEGLASSES; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BLANK FLOPPY DISKS, BLANK COMPACT DISKS, BLANK VIDEO DISKS, KEYBOARDS, COMPUTER CONTROL BALL DEVICES AND HOLDERS THEREFOR, COMPUTER DISPLAY COVERS, MOUSE PADS, JOY PADS, AND JOYSTICKS; MODEMS, RECORDS, COMPACT DISCS AND CASSETTES FEATURING STORIES, SONGS, MUSIC AND SOUNDTRACKS FROM TELEVISION PROGRAMS, ON-LINE MEDIA AND MOVIES; AND VIDEO DISCS AND CASSETTES FEATURING MOTION PICTURES AND TELEVISION SERIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |