USPTO serial 76355288
BROWN SUGAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BROWN SUGAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keino Campbell
KEINO CAMPBELL THE CAMPBELL FIRM3695-F CASCADE RD PMB #1136ATLANTA, GA 30331UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry, imitation jewelry and jewelry from precious metals, stones, and other materials not listed or defined in other categories, necklaces, bracelets, cufflinks, earings, toe rings, rings, ankle bracelets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | male and female lingerie clothing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | education and entertainment, movies, plays, music, multimedia movies, internet service, short film, publishing, songwriting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |