USPTO serial 76356103
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl Hormann,
KARL HORMANN LAW OFFICES OF KARL HORMANNPO BOX 381516CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138-2216UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Software for Programming and Printing Forms and Documents | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Licensing of computer software; Billing and bookkeeping services for others; Data processing; consultation services in the field of data processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication with computers and telecommunication devices; editing and receiving data and information processes by computers and telecommunication devices; exchange of electronic documents by computers and telecommunication devices; providing business-oriented information to others from data bases by direct online access | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on discs and online with relevant support and user manuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others and computer consultation services concerning electronic data administration; writing computer software programs for others of word and text processing and mathematical manipulation of business data; administration of business data documents for others; management and supervisory services relating to the printing of documents for others; e-commerce services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |