CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BEEFEATER

USPTO serial 76356437

BEEFEATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEEFEATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane E. Bullbrook

BYRON R JACOBSON ALLIED DOMECQ SPIRITS & WINE USA INCPO BOX 33006C/O MARLENE MUSHARBASHDETROIT, MI 48232

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018DUFFEL BAGS, TRAVELLING BAGS, GOLF UMBRELLAS, GYM BAGS, HAVERSACKS, KEY CASES, LUGGAGE TAGS, PURSES, LEATHER OR MESH SHOPPING BAGS, TOILETRY CASES SOLD EMPTY, UMBRELLAS, WALLETS AND WALKING STICKSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, FOOTWEAR, BEACHWEAR, COATS AND LEATHER COATS, GOLF SHIRTS, PAJAMAS, POLO SHIRTS, RUGBY SHIRTS, SCARVES, SHOES, SLIPPERS, SOCKS, SWEAT SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TRACKSUITS, UNDERWEAR, BELTS, MONEY BELTS, AND HEADGEAR NAMELY BANDANNAS AND CAPSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 20, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 20, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 20, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance