Drawing for MAKING SCIENCE BETTER AT BUSINESS AND BUSINESS BETTER AT SCIENCE

USPTO serial 76358116

MAKING SCIENCE BETTER AT BUSINESS AND BUSINESS BETTER AT SCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAKING SCIENCE BETTER AT BUSINESS AND BUSINESS BETTER AT SCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy L. Wright

KAREN A MCGEE BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Market research and analysis; business marketing and consulting; providing business and marketing information in the field of scientific, biotech, bio materials and material science information for research, design, development and collaboration via the InternetACTIVE
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the field of science, medical science, biotech, bio materials and material science and distributing course material in connection therewith; arranging and conducting symposia, conferences and expositions in the field of science, medical science, biotech, bio materials and material scienceACTIVE
042Scientific research; consulting and advisory services in the field of science, medical science, biotech, bio materials and material scienceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 18, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 18, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 18, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 17, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 20, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance