USPTO serial 76363560
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Worthing, Sussex BN12 5JP, GB
Worthing, Sussex BN12 5JP, GB
Berkshire, GB
80809 MUENCHEN, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee Gessner
Aimee Gessner Bayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftPeutelring 130Dept. AJ-55 (Trademarks)80809 Muenchen,| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Generators for land vehicles; structural parts for the foregoing ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Motor land vehicles, namely, automobiles and structural parts therefor; automobile bodywork components, namely, fenders, bumpers and wheels; automobile aerodynamic components, namely, front and rear bumpers, side skirts, and spoilers; automobile engines, gearboxes, transmissions, seats, suspensions, brakes and braking systems, steering wheels, and seat belts; automobile bodywork styling elements, namely, fenders and trim; automobile interior parts, namely, dashboards, and interior trim | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, [ BOOKS, ] BROCHURES, BOOKLETS, AND FLYERS [ ; PERIODICAL PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES; NEWSLETTERS; AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR, RACING, RESTORATION, CUSTOMIZING AND MAINTENANCE, VINTAGE AUTOMOBILES, AND MOTOR RALLIES AND TOURS ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, HATS, CAPS, [ SCARVES, ] T-SHIRTS, SWEATERS, KNIT SHIRTS, JACKETS [, LEATHER COATS, PANTS, AND VESTS, OVERALLS, AND OUTERWEAR, NAMELY, COATS, PARKAS, AND PULLOVERS ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | [ Organizing motor rallies, motor car tours and motor car races ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 7, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |