Drawing for MYSTRO

USPTO serial 76364952

MYSTRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYSTRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert T. Scherer, Esq.

PAUL A LEE TIME WARNER INCONE TIME WARNER CTR14-121NEW YORK, NY 10019

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Television and cable television broadcasting services; electronic transmission services providing access to multimedia entertainment, education, information and retail services, via television, cable television, interactive television, the Internet and telecommunications networks; video-on-demand and audio-on-demand transmission services; personal video recorder broadcasting and transmission services delivered based on viewer selectionACTIVE
041Television and cable television programming services; providing multimedia entertainment and education services, featuring movies, in the field of news, sports, drama, comedy, weather and music; ongoing television programs in the field of news, sports, drama, comedy, weather and music and other audio and video content in the field of news, sports, drama, comedy, weather and music, via television, cable television, interactive television, the Internet and telecommunications networks; personal video recorder programming services delivered based on viewer selectionACTIVE
042development of computer and communications technology, namely, computer software and hardware, for cable television operators for providing television and cable television broadcasting and programming servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 14, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Oct 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 1, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 5, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 16, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 8, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 8, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance