USPTO serial 76365771
STAR FLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAR FLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75019 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Carter
DAVID M CARTER CARTER & SCHNEDLER, PA56 CENTRAL AVE #101P O BOX 2985ASHEVILLE, NC 28802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | NON-INTIMATE FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES, SPORT SHOES, SANDALS, BOOTS, ANKLE BOOTS, MOCCASINS, CLOGS, LOAFERS, PLAIN PUMPS AND SHOES WITH WEDGE OUTSOLES; AND NON-INTIMATE CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |