USPTO serial 76365834
TIRAMISÙ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIRAMISÙ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
42100 Reggio Emilia, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V. Costigan
James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese, milk and milk beverages containing coffee | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |