USPTO serial 76365938
HYDRACEUTICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYDRACEUTICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritionally fortified beverages, namely, hydrating liquids and beverages and liquid and beverage components, all containing one or more of the following-- dietary supplements, vitamins, minerals, soluble fiber, anti-inflammatories, anti-oxidants, systemic enzymes, digestive enzymes, prebiotics, probiotics, herbal extracts, fruit extracts and other extracts, essences, and other natural and organic ingredients for use as nutritional supplements by the general public | ACTIVE | May 12, 2006 |
| 032 | Preparations for making hydrating liquids and beverages and liquid and beverage components, namely, enhanced waters, namely, aerated waters, drinking waters, flavored waters, mineral waters, soda waters and spring waters and non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit flavored beverages, soft drinks, fruit juices, fruit juice drinks, and concentrates, powders or syrups of use in the preparation of the same | ACTIVE | May 12, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stillman, Suzanne Jaffe
- Other trademarks owned by Stillman, Suzanne Jaffe
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named HYDRACEUTICAL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |