USPTO serial 76367597
EXILIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXILIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SINGAPORE 349560, SG
SINGAPORE 349560, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Liane L. Churney
LIANE L CHURNEY FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1699UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software not for application to the medical field, namely, programs to facilitate the operation of networking hardware systems and programs enabling telephone activities to be performed by a computer; computer hardware, namely, central processing units, monitors, computer keyboards, computer mice, disk drives, data storage devices, computer interfaces, portable computers, hand-held computers, notebook computers, integrated circuit cards, connectors, printers, scanners, routers, antennas for wireless communication, electronic and electric switches, modems, telephone intercoms, blank integrated circuit cards for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and images in mobile telephone services, hubs and switches for transmitting data through the telephone network, telephone intercom add-on cards, telecommunications switchboards, switchboards for telephone exchanges and telephone networks, communication hubs, wireless receivers, wireless transmitters, wireless routers, wireless cards, and computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |