USPTO serial 76368296
TIGER TIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIGER TIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nottingham NG7 2UT, GB
Nottingham NG7 2UT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RENE M. LAFORTE
RENE M LAFORTE THOMPSON HINE LLPPO BOX 8801DAYTON, OH 45401-8801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried pulses, namely, dried chick peas, dried red lentils, dried green lentils, dried red beans, dried black eye beans, dried soy beans, dried long beans; processed pulses, namely, processed chick peas, processed red lentils, processed green lentils, processed red beans, processed black eye beans, processed soy beans, processed long beans; processed garlic which is used as a vegetable; pickles, namely, mango line pickles, bringle pickles, chili pickles, mixed pickles, and other ethnic based pickles; Asian canned vegetables, namely, bamboo shoots, chestnuts, baby corn, whole sweet corn, cream style corn, okra, and chickpeas; Asian canned fruits, namely, mango, rambutan, and lychee | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Minced spices, namely minced garlic; powdered spices, namely, powdered garlic and powdered ginger; Crystalized spices, namely crystalized ginger; ginger in the nature of a powdered spice; pickled spices, namely, pickled ginger; preserved spices, namely, preserved ginger; processed herbs, namely, oregano, mint and sage; unprocessed grains, namely, jasmine rice, glutinous rice, basmati rice; food products, namely, rice sticks, rice vermacelli, noodles; and chutneys, namely, papaya chutneys, mango chutneys, and other ethnic chutneys; Asian frozen food entrees consisting primarily of rice or pasta, namely, samosa, spring rolls, and dim sum | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh spices, namely fresh garlic and fresh ginger; Raw spices, namely, raw garlic and raw ginger; unprocessed spices, namely, unprocessed garlic and unprocessed ginger; fresh herbs, namely, oregano, mint and sage; raw herbs, namely, oregano, mint and sage; unprocessed herbs, namely, oregano, mint and sage; unprocessed grains for eating; fresh pulses, namely, chick peas, red lentils, green lentils, red beans, black eye beans, soy beans, long beans | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Asian fruit drinks, Asian fruit flavored drinks, and Asian flavored soft drinks, excluding beer, beer products, ale, and any alcoholic product | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperama, PLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperama, PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TIGER TIGER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |