USPTO serial 76368574
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Memphis, TN
Memphis, TN
Memphis, TN
MEMPHIS, TN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam S. Baldridge
Adam S. Baldridge Baker Donelson, et al.165 Madison Ave, Suite 2000MEMPHIS, TN 38103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES PROVIDED TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS, HEALTH CARE SUPPLIERS, AND MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDERS, IN RELATION TO FEDERALLY MANDATED AND STATE MANDATED MEDICAL PEER REVIEW PROGRAMS; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION AND REVIEW SERVICES; HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT AND COST REVIEW SERVICES, MEDICAL COST MANAGEMENT SERVICES; MARKET ANALYSIS OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, NAMELY STUDIES OF HEALTH CARE NEEDS AND TRENDS AMONG DEFINED POPULATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2002 |
| 036 | ADMINISTRATION OF HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS AND HEALTH BENEFITS CLAIMS, NAMELY, PAYMENT ERROR DETECTION [ AND PAYMENT ERROR PREVENTION ]; RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES FEATURING PEER REVIEW OF MEDICAL PRACTICES AND PEER REVIEW OF COMPLAINTS BY RECIPIENTS REGARDING THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE RECEIVED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2002 |
| 042 | ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES FEATURING PEER REVIEW OF MEDICAL PRACTICES, INDEPENDENT QUALITY REVIEW OF MEDICAL SERVICES RENDERED, AND INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF CLAIMS AS REQUIRED BY VARIOUS STATES; QUALITY CONTROL FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |