USPTO serial 76370266
SPORTS4LESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2003
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPORTS4LESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodland Hills, CA
Woodland Hills, CA
CANOGA PARK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Sereboff
Steven C. Sereboff SoCal IP Law Group LLP310 N. Westlake Blvd. Suite 120Westlake Village, CA 91367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS EQUIPMENT, CLOTHING AND SPORTING GOODS, PROVIDED THROUGH A WEB SITE ON THE INTERNET | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 20, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |