USPTO serial 76371942
RISE & SHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RISE & SHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy Machaalany
Roy Machaalany Flansberry Menard and Associates208-4275 Innes Rd.Ottawa, Ontario, K1C1T1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | cooperative advertising and marketing program in the field of health care | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |