Drawing for HOMEWORX

USPTO serial 76373095

HOMEWORX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMEWORX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L Pruden, Esq.

JAMES L PRUDEN ESQ JAMES L PRUDEN PA980 N FEDERAL HWY STE 404BOCA RATON, FL 33432UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037home repair and renovation services; building construction of home additions and rooms; repair of cabinets, electrical fixtures, floors, roofs, walls and ceilings; and installation of walls, floors, roofs, cabinets, plumbing and electrical fixturesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 12, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 19, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2006UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Jan 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 11, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 22, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance