USPTO serial 76373334
FINISH PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FINISH PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Bonini, Jr.
FRANK J BONINI JR HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY86 THE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE E1288 VALLEY FORGE RD P O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | paint-related products, namely, stabilizers and crosslinking agents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |