USPTO serial 76374542
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 S FIRST ST 12TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Balustrades; beams, not made of metal; exterior shutters, not made of metal or textile; flooring boards; branching pipes, not made of metal, for plumbing; Non-metal building materials, namely, plastic, wood, stone, and concrete; building panels, not made of metal; building timber; prefabricated buildings, not made of metal; transportable buildings, not made of metal; cardboard building material; chicken-houses, not made of metal; chimney covers, not made of metal; cladding for building, not made of metal; advertisement columns, not made of metal; construction materials, not made of metal; building coverings namely facing materials for building exteriors; crash barriers for roads, not made of metal; diving boards, not made of metal; floating docks for mooring boats, not made of metal; door casings, not made of metal; door frames, not made of metal; door panels, not made of metal; doors, not made of metal; drain pipes made of concrete, plastic, earthenware or sandstone; drain traps or valves, not made of metal or plastic; ducts for ventilating and air-conditioning installations, not made of metal; fair huts; fences, not made of metal; parquet floor boards; floor tiles, not made of metal; parquet flooring; floors, not made of metal; folding doors, not made of metal; building framing materials, not made of metal; cement for furnaces; wood furrings; gates, not made of metal; greenhouse frames, not made of metal; gutter pipes, not made of metal; hips for roofing; insulating glass for building; joists, not made of metal; laths, not made of metal; latticework, not made of metal; lumber; moldable wood; moldings for building, not made of metal; cornice moldings, not made of metal; mooring bollards made of concrete; mosaics for building; mouldable wood; partitions, not made of metal; pilings, not made of metal; plywood; poles for electrical power lines, not made of metal; railway sleepers, not made of metal; reeds for building; binding material for road repair; roof coverings, not made of metal; roof flashing, not made of metal; roofing slates; roofing, not made of metal; scaffolding, not made of metal; shutter, not made of metal; shuttering for concrete, not made of metal; stave wood; tarred strips for building; tile flooring, not made of metal; manufactured timber; sawn timber; worked timber; trellises, not made of metal; veneer wood; veneers for flooring; wall claddings for building, not made of metal; wall linings for building, not made of metal; wall tiles for building, not made of metal; window frames, not made of metal; windows, not made of metal; wood for making household utensils; wood paneling; wood paving; wood pulp board, for building; wood veneers; wood, semi-worked | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |