USPTO serial 76375054
RAGAMUFFIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAGAMUFFIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Yorkshire, GB
West Yorkshire, GB
West Yorkshire, GB
West Yorkshire, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE FEATURING OUR RAGAMUFFIN CHARACTERS RELATED MUSIC SOUNDS AND IMAGES, TAPED SOUND RECORDINGS FEATURING OUR RAGAMUFFIN CHARACTERS RELATED MUSIC AND SOUNDS, PHONOGRAPHIC RECORDS FEATURING OUR RAGAMUFFIN CHARACTERS RELATED MUSIC AND SOUNDS, AUDIO CASSETTES FEATURING OUR RAGAMUFFIN CHARACTERS RELATED MUSIC AND SOUNDS, COMPACT DISCS FEATURING OUR RAGAMUFFIN CHARACTERS RELATED MUSIC AND SOUNDS, MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING OUR RAGAMUFFIN CHARACTERS RELATED MUSIC, SOUNDS AND IMAGES,MUSICAL VIDEO RECORDINGS FEATURING OUR RAGAMUFFIN CHARACTERS RELATED MUSIC,SOUNDS AND IMAGES, DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS FEATURING OUR RAGAMUFFIN CHARACTERS MUSIC, SOUNDS AND IMAGES, DIGITAL SOUND RECORDINGS FEATURING G OUR RAGAMUFFIN CHARACTERS MUSIC AND SOUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |