USPTO serial 76377642
AMTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2004
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ST. JOSEPH, MO
St. Joseph, MO
St. Joseph, MO
St. Joseph, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan J. Wharton
STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1201 WALNUT, STE 2800KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | ANIMAL HEALTH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, ANESTHETICS FOR SURGICAL USE; ANTIBACTERIAL PHARMACEUTICALS; ANALGESICS; ENDO AND ECTO PARASITICIDES, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS; CORTICOSTERIODS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATION; HORMONES FOR LIVESTOCK AND OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS; THERAPEUTIC PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MUSCLE RELAXANTS AND SEDATIVES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 28, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PSI HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Phoenix Scientific, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Phoenix Scientific, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Phoenix Scientific, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named AMTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |