USPTO serial 76377860
FLEUR-DE-LIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2902504Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2004
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLEUR-DE-LIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
August E. Roehrig, Jr.
AUGUST E. ROEHRIG, JR. LUEDEKA, NEELY & GRAHAM, P.C.P.O. BOX 1871KNOXVILLE, TN 37901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Table flatware, namely, knives, forks, and spoons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |