USPTO serial 76378142
PNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Middlesex, TW7 5AX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich, Esq.
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications and communication services; online telecommunications and communication services; online telecommunications and communication providing access to software, commercial and business information; providing communications by computer terminals; reception, recordal, transmission, networking, storage and display of information from a databank; message sending; computer-aided transmission of messages and images; electronic communications providing electronic transmission of voice, data, facsimile, video and information; telecommunication of information (including web pages), computer programs and any other data or images; providing user access to the Internet (service providers) and the world wide web; providing telecommunications access and links to computer databases and the Internet; gateway services for access to a communications or computer network; managed wide area networks; electronic mail services; electronic order transmission services; facsimile, telex, telephone, mobile telephone and telegram services; information and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services; consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |