USPTO serial 76378289
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | BAKERY OVENS, TOASTERS, GRILLING APPLIANCES, COOKING APPLIANCES AND INSTALLATIONS, COOKING PLATES, COOKING STOVES; ACCESSORIES FOR ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | BAKERY GOODS AND CONFECTIONERY GOODS; SUGAR GOODS, IN PARTICULAR SWEETS, FRUIT SWEETS, CARAMEL SWEETS, CHEWING GUM; BISCUITS; ICE-CREAM PRODUCTS; FROZEN SUGAR, CHOCOLATE, BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY GOODS; OVEN-READY DOUGH GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION OF BAKERY POINS, CAFES, CONFECTIONERY SHOPS, SHOPPING CENTRES; INNS, ACCOMMODATION BUSINESS, HOTELS, RESTAURANTS, SELF-SERVICE SHOPS, PETROL-STATION SHOPS, SNACK BARS AND BUFFETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL PLANNING AND CONSULTATION OF GASTRONOMIC BUSINESS; OPERATION OF CAFES, CONFECTIONERY BUSINESSES, HOTELS, RESTAURANTS AND SNACK BARS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |