Drawing for MOULINEX

USPTO serial 76380248

MOULINEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOULINEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow, Esquire

Mark Lebow, Esquire YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric food processing machines, namely, graters, blenders, mixers, kneader, mincers, grinders and food cutting machines, coffee mills, fruit juicers, fruit and vegetable centrifugal extractors, vegetable peelers, slicers, vegetable cutting machines, electric knives, salad drainers; knife grinding machines; can opening machines; dish washing machines; clothes washing machines; machines for treating floors and walls, namely, sanders and washers; window glass washing machines; vacuum cleaners; ice shaving machinesACTIVE
008non-electric food mincersACTIVE
009weighing apparatus, namely, scales; electric pressing irons; remote controllers for use with audio or video receivers; apparatus for transmission, recording, and reproduction of sound or images and data processing, namely, computers for domestic use; cloth ironing machines, and cloth ironing presses, heating hair brushesACTIVE
011electric handheld hair dryers; electric space heaters; room humidifiers; electric room fans; electric apparatus for cooking foods, namely, ovens, rotisseries, spit roasters, electric grills, meat broilers, deep fat fryers, cooking stoves, warmers, plate warmers, electric sauce pans, crepe cookers, egg cookers, baby bottle warmers, and electric machines for preparing infusion, namely, electric coffee makers; apparatus for preparing yogurts, namely, electric yogurt makers; water filters for producing portable water for household use; ice cream freezers; refrigerating apparatus, namely, refrigerators, refrigerated beverage dispensing cabinets; grills for supporting goods during cooking, namely, electric grills, electric kettles; clothes dryers, electric hot air hand dryers; air filters for domestic use; fume and odor exhausting or destructing hoods for ranges or kitchens; water purification equipment, namely, water softeners; electric water heaters for domestic use; ice making machines; electric spits for use with electric grillsACTIVE
021non-electric portable small household utensils for kitchen use, namely, strainers, graters, grinders for grinding coffee; beaters, namely, egg beaters; mixers, sieves, fruit presses and mashers, plastic salad drying baskets, non-electric filter coffee makers, tea pots not of precious metal; food cooking vessels, namely, cake pans, cake molds; hair combs; vibrating hair brushes and hair combs; salt mills and pepper mills; vessels for foods and beverages, namely, cups, jugs, bowls and plates; siphons for aerated water or cream; food cooking vessels, namely, stew pans, frying pans, sauce pans; non-electric pressure cookers; cleaning instruments, namely, crumb cleaners, brooms, carpet sweepers, sponge mops, wringer mops, window glass washers, namely, cleaning cloths; shoe brushes; electric tooth brushes; non-electric kettlesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 9, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 1, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Sep 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 17, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 3, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance