USPTO serial 76380823
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Logsdon
WILLIAM H LOGSDON WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN700 KOPPERS BLDG436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Processing machines for screening, crushing, and separating solids and liquids comprised of-- sizing screens, namely screens for sorting objects according to size, hydraulic classifiers, namely devices for separating solids of different characteristics by controlled rates of settling according to bulk density using water, thickeners, namely apparatus for the sedimentation and removal of solids suspended in various liquids, jigs, namely apparatus for washing coal or separating ore from gangue by shaking and washing according to bulk density, attritioners, namely devices for scrubbing sand to clean it, sump pumps, hydrocyclones, namely devices for removing small or powdered solids by centrifugal force using water, manifolds for connecting a plurality of hydrocyclones to a single source, centrifugal pumps, and belt filter presses for processing minerals including aggregates, sands, gravel, salts, coal, iron ore, feldspar, copper, lead, zinc, phosphate and the like | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 2001 |
| 037 | Plant designs, namely repair and reconstruction of processing equipment, plant erection, namely construction of structural supports for equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 2001 |
| 040 | consulting services in the field of material processing equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |