Drawing for LPT

USPTO serial 76380823

LPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2988456Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 30, 2005
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Logsdon

WILLIAM H LOGSDON WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN700 KOPPERS BLDG436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Processing machines for screening, crushing, and separating solids and liquids comprised of-- sizing screens, namely screens for sorting objects according to size, hydraulic classifiers, namely devices for separating solids of different characteristics by controlled rates of settling according to bulk density using water, thickeners, namely apparatus for the sedimentation and removal of solids suspended in various liquids, jigs, namely apparatus for washing coal or separating ore from gangue by shaking and washing according to bulk density, attritioners, namely devices for scrubbing sand to clean it, sump pumps, hydrocyclones, namely devices for removing small or powdered solids by centrifugal force using water, manifolds for connecting a plurality of hydrocyclones to a single source, centrifugal pumps, and belt filter presses for processing minerals including aggregates, sands, gravel, salts, coal, iron ore, feldspar, copper, lead, zinc, phosphate and the likeSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 2, 2001
037Plant designs, namely repair and reconstruction of processing equipment, plant erection, namely construction of structural supports for equipmentSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 2, 2001
040consulting services in the field of material processing equipmentSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 2, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Aug 30, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 1, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 21, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 20, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 18, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Feb 12, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 12, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 24, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 24, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance