USPTO serial 76381740
KERNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KERNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
High Wycombe, Bucks HP12 4HU, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Kent
EVAN M KENT RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD 12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL SERVICES RENDERED IN THE FIELDS OF MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT; ELECTRICAL AND OPTICAL EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, CABLING APPARATUS AND CABLES, INDUSTRIAL, SCIENTIFIC AND MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, SATELLITE RECEIVING APPARATUS, SECURITY SYSTEMS, POWER SUPPLIES AND DOMESTIC APPLIANCES; AEROSPACE; TELECOMMUNICATIONS; GAMES AND TOYS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEASURING AND CONTROLLING DEVICES; AND MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |