USPTO serial 76386380
BEAUTIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAUTIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |