Drawing for RALPH

USPTO serial 76388815

RALPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RALPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Panaccione

G ROXANNE ELINGS GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PLANNING OF RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIESACTIVE
041GOLF RESORTSACTIVE
043HOTELS, RESTAURANTS, BARS AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES; RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES FOR SENIOR ADULTS AND THE ELDERLYACTIVE
044HEALTH SPA SERVICESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 12, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 20, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 2, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 15, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 18, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 17, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance