USPTO serial 76389833
SUNCHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNCHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN R. STERN, MARVIN
MARVIN R STERN, MARVIN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG 400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Soft Drinks Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Soft Drinks Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SUNCHY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |