USPTO serial 76394875
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
254 66 Helsingborg, SE
254 66 Helsingborg, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Nabor
JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE ST STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS STORED ON TAPES, DISCS, DISKETTES, CD-ROM AND OTHER MACHINE-READABLE MEDIA, NAMELY FOR OPTICAL SCANNING DATA CAPTURE, IMAGE CAPTURING, AND AUTOMATIC FORM PROCESSING; COMPUTERS, COMPUTER MEMORIES, COMPUTER MONITORS; COMPUTER KEYBOARDS, COMPUTER PRINTERS, OPTICAL SCANNERS, COMPUTER CHIPS AND MICROPROCESSORS; PARTS FOR ALL THE BEFORE MENTIONED GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | COMPUTER SUPPORTED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND PICTURES; COMMUNICATION VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC MAIL AND TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND IMAGES; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO THE INTERNET AND DATA NETWORKS; LEASING OF MODEMS AND TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES VIA ELECTRONIC MEDIA; AND TRANSMISSION OF DATA VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF OPTICAL SCANNING, DATA CAPTURE AND IMAGE CAPTURING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTERIZED CONTACT MEDIATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM ANALYSIS; DESIGN OF COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR OTHERS; DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND WEBSITES FOR OTHERS; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS; COMPUTER HARDWARE CONSULTATION; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS; LEASING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, AND COMPUTERS; LEASING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS; LEASING COMPUTER FACILITIES; AND RECOVERY OF COMPUTER DATA | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |