Drawing for BRAINTRUST

USPTO serial 76398467

BRAINTRUST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAINTRUST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore S. Maceiko

Theodore S. Maceiko Jones Day555 S. Flower Street50th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized database management for data regarding loans, loan portfolios and lines of creditACTIVE—
036Financial analysis and consultation services, namely, reviewing, analyzing, providing due diligence, underwriting; quality control, auditing and reporting on loans, loan portfolios and lines of creditACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, manipulating data and creating databases for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 9, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance