USPTO serial 76399744
SHENANDOAH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHENANDOAH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fredensborg, 3480, DK
FREDENSBORG, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling, Esq.
LOUIS K EBLING GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC2800 CHEMED CTR255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | (Based on Use in Commerce) live roses; (Based on Intent to Use) live clematis | ACTIVE | Feb 7, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |