USPTO serial 76401642
CHURRITOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHURRITOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H. BREWSTER
WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLPSTE 2800 1100 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CORN CHIPS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TERAN, SERGIO VELA
- Other trademarks owned by BOTANAS Y DERIVADOS, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by BOTANAS Y DERIVADOS, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHURRITOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |